Emilio Gomez vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Las Vegas CH Round of 32

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU7
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Gomez E.
7-6 6-0
Stebe C.
Gomez E.
7762
Stebe C.
6200

Emilio Gomez defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 7-6 6-0 in the Las Vegas CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
51
Break points saved·Even
77
75
Break points won·Slight edge
19
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Stebe C.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kozlov S.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-4
Wolf J.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Wolf J.
Escobedo E.
6-36-3
Kovacevic A.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.
Gomez E.[7]
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Torpegaard M.
6-16-756-1
R16
Wolf J.
Kudla D.[2]
4-66-36-0
Escobedo E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Ito T.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.
Altmaier D.[4]
7-676-3
Gomez E.[7]
Kubler J.
2-66-07-68
Kozlov S.
Mchugh A.
6-25-77-613
Torpegaard M.
Kelly D.
6-26-3
R32
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.
6-767-627-65
Kudla D.[2]
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Wolf J.
Mochizuki S.
6-37-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Jung J.[8]
7-56-2
Kelly D.
Bulus C.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.
Chappell N.
6-26-1
Vukic A.
Krueger M.[6]
6-46-1
Ito T.
Young D.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.
Eubanks C.
6-13-67-65
Altmaier D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-1
Kubler J.
Watanuki Y.
6-756-07-66
Kozlov S.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mchugh A.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Gomez E.[7]
Stebe C.
7-626-0
Daniel T.[5]
Sauer J.
6-06-2
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.[3]
6-747-53-0