Anastasia Gasanova vs Jil Teichmann — Cluj-Napoca 2 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 2 · WTA · Round of 32
Anastasia Gasanova
RUS
Anastasia Gasanova
#174WTA
1491ELO
1485Hard ELO
27 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Jil Teichmann
SUI4
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Gasanova A.
4-6 6-0 7-5
Teichmann J.
Gasanova A.
4672
Teichmann J.
6051

Anastasia Gasanova defeated Jil Teichmann 4-6 6-0 7-5 in the Cluj-Napoca 2 round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jil Teichmann came in ranked #119.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gasanova A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Gasanova A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasanova A.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
40%
47%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
49%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasanova A.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
50
Break points saved·Dominant
21
71
Break points won·Clear edge
100
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasanova A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Teichmann J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1485
Surface ELO
6.4+146 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1491
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1687
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
5.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gasanova A.Teichmann J.
Freshness·Even
97
100

Gasanova A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Halep S.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Halep S.[1]
Kostyuk M.[6]
6-06-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Peterson R.
Tsurenko L.
6-23-66-3
Kostyuk M.[6]
Raducanu E.[3]
6-26-1
Halep S.[1]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Kalinina A.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Raducanu E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Halep S.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Cristian J.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
7-657-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Peterson R.
Bara I.
6-06-3
Tsurenko L.
Gasanova A.
6-27-5
Kalinina A.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-4
R32
Halep S.[1]
Ruse E.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[3]
Hercog P.
4-67-56-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Kovinic D.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.
Jorovic I.
7-616-4
Gasanova A.
Teichmann J.[4]
4-66-07-5
Bara I.
Begu I.[7]
7-620-66-4
Cristian J.
Juvan K.
3-67-687-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Potapova A.
6-25-77-5
Gracheva V.
Petkovic A.
6-42-66-4
Barthel M.
Bondar A.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Peterson R.
Fett J.
6-16-3
Tsurenko L.
Prisacariu A.
7-56-2
Kalinina A.[8]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-1
Friedsam A.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
5-76-46-4
Kontaveit A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-37-5