Anna Lena Friedsam vs Alexandra Cadantu Ignatik — Cluj-Napoca 2 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 2 · WTA · Round of 32
Anna Lena Friedsam
GER
Anna Lena Friedsam
#227WTA
1571ELO
1515Hard ELO
32 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
ROU
Alexandra Cadantu Ignatik
36 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLL
Friedsam A.
5-7 6-4 6-4
Cadantu Ignatik A.
Friedsam A.
5662
Cadantu Ignatik A.
7441

Anna Lena Friedsam defeated Alexandra Cadantu Ignatik 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the Cluj-Napoca 2 round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Friedsam A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cadantu Ignatik A.

Cadantu Ignatik A.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Friedsam A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Friedsam A.Cadantu Ignatik A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
55%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
40%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
50%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
49%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
49%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
0.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Friedsam A.Cadantu Ignatik A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
20
Break points saved·Dominant
77
5
Break points won·Clear edge
58
80
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
55
Tiebreaks·
86
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Friedsam A.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Cadantu Ignatik A.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 833 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Friedsam A.Cadantu Ignatik A.
Freshness·
100
—

Friedsam A.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Halep S.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Halep S.[1]
Kostyuk M.[6]
6-06-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Peterson R.
Tsurenko L.
6-23-66-3
Kostyuk M.[6]
Raducanu E.[3]
6-26-1
Halep S.[1]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Kalinina A.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Raducanu E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Halep S.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Cristian J.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
7-657-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Peterson R.
Bara I.
6-06-3
Tsurenko L.
Gasanova A.
6-27-5
Kalinina A.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-4
R32
Halep S.[1]
Ruse E.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[3]
Hercog P.
4-67-56-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Kovinic D.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.
Jorovic I.
7-616-4
Gasanova A.
Teichmann J.[4]
4-66-07-5
Bara I.
Begu I.[7]
7-620-66-4
Cristian J.
Juvan K.
3-67-687-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Potapova A.
6-25-77-5
Gracheva V.
Petkovic A.
6-42-66-4
Barthel M.
Bondar A.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Peterson R.
Fett J.
6-16-3
Tsurenko L.
Prisacariu A.
7-56-2
Kalinina A.[8]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-1
Friedsam A.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
5-76-46-4
Kontaveit A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-37-5