Ann Li vs Magdalena Frech — Courmayeur Round of 16

Courmayeur · WTA · Round of 16
Ann Li
USA9
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Magdalena Frech
POL
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1700Hard ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Li A.
5-7 6-3 6-1
Frech M.
Li A.
5662
Frech M.
7311

Ann Li defeated Magdalena Frech 5-7 6-3 6-1 in the Courmayeur round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ann Li extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-08DohaR32hardAnn Li6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Frech M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Li A.

Serve advantage — Li A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Frech M.
47
Serve
32
49
Return
47

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Frech M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Frech M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
55
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
76
Break points won·Clear edge
87
71
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
72
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Frech M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+46 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1700
5.8Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1725
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
4.3
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Frech M.
Freshness·Even
97
98

Li A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Frech M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4