Jonas Forejtek vs Jordan Thompson — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1333Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Forejtek J.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Thompson J.
Forejtek J.
5662
Thompson J.
7221

Jonas Forejtek defeated Jordan Thompson 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
70
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
97
Break points won·Clear edge
6
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Thompson J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.3Hard Elo 1333
Surface ELO
9.7+400 Hard Elo edge
0.7Overall Elo 1387
ELO gap
9.3Overall Elo 1772
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O