Jonas Forejtek vs Yannick Maden — Ismaning CH Round of 16

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1333Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
GER
Yannick Maden
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWL
Forejtek J.
7-6 3-6 6-1
Maden Y.
Forejtek J.
77362
Maden Y.
63611

Jonas Forejtek defeated Yannick Maden 7-6 3-6 6-1 in the Ismaning CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yannick Maden came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Jonas Forejtek came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Maden Y.

Maden Y.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Maden Y.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Maden Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
70
Break points won·Dominant
6
39
Deciding sets·Clear edge
7
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Maden Y.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
2.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 9
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O