Rebecca Peterson vs Jana Fett — Cluj-Napoca 2 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 2 · WTA · Round of 32
SWE
Rebecca Peterson
30 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
CRO
Jana Fett
#415WTA
1580ELO
1523Hard ELO
29 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
Peterson R.
6-1 6-3
Fett J.
Peterson R.
662
Fett J.
130

Rebecca Peterson defeated Jana Fett 6-1 6-3 in the Cluj-Napoca 2 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Rebecca Peterson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Rebecca Peterson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-09NanchangR16hardRebecca Peterson7-6(1) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Peterson R.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fett J.

Fett J.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Peterson R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peterson R.Fett J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
53%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
6.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peterson R.Fett J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
28
Break points saved·Even
36
36
Break points won·Slight edge
76
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
60
47
Tiebreaks·Dominant
67
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peterson R.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fett J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Halep S.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Halep S.[1]
Kostyuk M.[6]
6-06-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Peterson R.
Tsurenko L.
6-23-66-3
Kostyuk M.[6]
Raducanu E.[3]
6-26-1
Halep S.[1]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Kalinina A.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Raducanu E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Halep S.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Cristian J.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
7-657-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Peterson R.
Bara I.
6-06-3
Tsurenko L.
Gasanova A.
6-27-5
Kalinina A.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-4
R32
Halep S.[1]
Ruse E.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[3]
Hercog P.
4-67-56-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Kovinic D.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.
Jorovic I.
7-616-4
Gasanova A.
Teichmann J.[4]
4-66-07-5
Bara I.
Begu I.[7]
7-620-66-4
Cristian J.
Juvan K.
3-67-687-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Potapova A.
6-25-77-5
Gracheva V.
Petkovic A.
6-42-66-4
Barthel M.
Bondar A.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Peterson R.
Fett J.
6-16-3
Tsurenko L.
Prisacariu A.
7-56-2
Kalinina A.[8]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-1
Friedsam A.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
5-76-46-4
Kontaveit A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-37-5