Thomas Fabbiano vs Alexey Vatutin — Brest CH Round of 32

Brest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1382Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Fabbiano T.
7-6 7-5
Vatutin A.
Fabbiano T.
7772
Vatutin A.
6450

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Alexey Vatutin 7-6 7-5 in the Brest CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Vatutin A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
0
Break points saved·Dominant
81
18
Break points won·Clear edge
16
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fabbiano T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vatutin A.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[4]
Sousa J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Nakashima B.[4]
Muller A.
6-27-5
Sousa J.
Janvier M.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sousa J.
Gaio F.
6-36-757-65
Nakashima B.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-17-5
Muller A.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Janvier M.
Gasquet R.[3]
W/O
R16
Sousa J.
De Schepper K.
6-47-66
Gaio F.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-67-636-2
Janvier M.
Gaston H.[8]
7-652-66-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Rune H.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[4]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-1
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[5]
7-641-66-1
Van Assche L.
Guinard M.
7-646-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-24-66-2
R32
Sousa J.
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Hoang A.
4-66-46-4
Gaio F.
Herbert P.[6]
6-43-66-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Lehecka J.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Royer V.
3-67-56-0
Gaston H.[8]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Broady L.
6-17-5
Rune H.
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Verdasco F.
3-66-46-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Piros Z.
6-37-64
Travaglia S.[5]
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Van Assche L.
Horansky F.
6-36-3
Guinard M.
Rinderknech A.[1]
6-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Vatutin A.
7-647-5
Muller A.
Nedovyesov A.
6-33-67-62
De Schepper K.
Taberner C.
7-657-65