Richard Gasquet vs Thomas Fabbiano — Brest CH Round of 16

Brest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA3
Richard Gasquet
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Gasquet R.
6-2 4-6 6-2
Fabbiano T.
Gasquet R.
6462
Fabbiano T.
2621

Richard Gasquet defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the Brest CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Richard Gasquet extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Richard Gasquet closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-04-09MarrakechR32clayRichard Gasquet6-1 7-6(2)
2015-05-10Rome MastersR64clayRichard Gasquet6-1 7-6(0)

Serve vs return

This season
Gasquet R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasquet R.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasquet R.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
81
Break points won·Dominant
49
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasquet R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fabbiano T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[4]
Sousa J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Nakashima B.[4]
Muller A.
6-27-5
Sousa J.
Janvier M.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sousa J.
Gaio F.
6-36-757-65
Nakashima B.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-17-5
Muller A.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Janvier M.
Gasquet R.[3]
W/O
R16
Sousa J.
De Schepper K.
6-47-66
Gaio F.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-67-636-2
Janvier M.
Gaston H.[8]
7-652-66-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Rune H.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[4]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-46-1
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[5]
7-641-66-1
Van Assche L.
Guinard M.
7-646-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-24-66-2
R32
Sousa J.
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Hoang A.
4-66-46-4
Gaio F.
Herbert P.[6]
6-43-66-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Lehecka J.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Royer V.
3-67-56-0
Gaston H.[8]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Broady L.
6-17-5
Rune H.
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Verdasco F.
3-66-46-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Piros Z.
6-37-64
Travaglia S.[5]
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Van Assche L.
Horansky F.
6-36-3
Guinard M.
Rinderknech A.[1]
6-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Vatutin A.
7-647-5
Muller A.
Nedovyesov A.
6-33-67-62
De Schepper K.
Taberner C.
7-657-65