Maxime Cressy vs Kacper Zuk — Ismaning CH Quarter-final

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA7
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Cressy M.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Zuk K.
Cressy M.
676772
Zuk K.
794641

Maxime Cressy defeated Kacper Zuk 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Ismaning CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Maxime Cressy came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
76
Break points won·Slight edge
2
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
32
25
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
8
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zuk K.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.3
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O