Aliona Bolsova vs Su Wei Hsieh — Courmayeur Round of 32

Courmayeur · WTA · Round of 32
Aliona Bolsova
ESP
Aliona Bolsova
#333WTA
1510ELO
1459Hard ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
TPE
Su Wei Hsieh
40 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWWW
Bolsova A.
6-1 6-7 6-4
Hsieh S.
Bolsova A.
66262
Hsieh S.
17741

Aliona Bolsova defeated Su Wei Hsieh 6-1 6-7 6-4 in the Courmayeur round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aliona Bolsova came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bolsova A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Hsieh S.

Hsieh S.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bolsova A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bolsova A.Hsieh S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
55%
55%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
63%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
5.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bolsova A.Hsieh S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
18
55
Break points saved·Dominant
30
59
Break points won·Slight edge
80
70
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bolsova A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hsieh S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.3
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Vekic D.
Tauson C.[5]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Vekic D.
Paolini J.[7]
6-26-0
Tauson C.[5]
Samsonova L.[3]
4-67-686-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[7]
Yastremska D.[10]
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Wang X.
6-46-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-16-2
Tauson C.[5]
Li A.[9]
3-66-46-2
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-30-66-3
Paolini J.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-47-5
Yastremska D.[10]
Baindl K.
6-13-67-5
Vekic D.
Zheng S.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.[8]
7-656-4
Samsonova L.[3]
Bolsova A.
6-36-3
Tauson C.[5]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-46-1
Li A.[9]
Frech M.
5-76-36-1
R32
Wang X.
Bucsa C.
6-15-0
Kalinskaya A.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Li A.[9]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-36-4
Yastremska D.[10]
Diatchenko V.
6-36-1
Baindl K.
Bronzetti L.
6-16-3
Paolini J.[7]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-1
Vekic D.
Zheng Q.
7-616-2
Bolsova A.
Hsieh S.
6-16-726-4
Gatto Monticone G.
Caregaro M.
6-47-63
Tauson C.[5]
Voegele S.
6-26-2
Stefanini L.
Minella M.
6-33-67-5
Zheng S.
Martic P.[4]
6-36-4
Zhang S.[8]
Pieri J.
6-16-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Raina A.
6-16-1
Samsonova L.[3]
Wagner S.
6-36-0
Frech M.
Radwanska U.
6-26-4