Emma Raducanu vs Ana Bogdan — Cluj-Napoca 2 Round of 16

Cluj-Napoca 2 · WTA · Round of 16
Emma Raducanu
GBR3
Emma Raducanu
#38WTA
1834ELO
1773Hard ELO
$605kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
ROU
Ana Bogdan
33 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Raducanu E.
6-3 6-4
Bogdan A.
Raducanu E.
662
Bogdan A.
340

Emma Raducanu defeated Ana Bogdan 6-3 6-4 in the Cluj-Napoca 2 round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Emma Raducanu closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Raducanu E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bogdan A.

Bogdan A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Raducanu E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Raducanu E.Bogdan A.
32
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Raducanu E.Bogdan A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (165 vs 192). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Raducanu E.Bogdan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
31
Break points saved·Dominant
96
56
Break points won·Clear edge
99
86
Deciding sets·Slight edge
29
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Raducanu E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bogdan A.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Halep S.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Halep S.[1]
Kostyuk M.[6]
6-06-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Peterson R.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Peterson R.
Tsurenko L.
6-23-66-3
Kostyuk M.[6]
Raducanu E.[3]
6-26-1
Halep S.[1]
Cristian J.
6-16-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Kalinina A.[8]
6-36-1
R16
Raducanu E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Halep S.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Cristian J.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
7-657-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Peterson R.
Bara I.
6-06-3
Tsurenko L.
Gasanova A.
6-27-5
Kalinina A.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[2]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-4
R32
Halep S.[1]
Ruse E.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[3]
Hercog P.
4-67-56-1
Van Uytvanck A.
Kovinic D.
6-46-4
Bogdan A.
Jorovic I.
7-616-4
Gasanova A.
Teichmann J.[4]
4-66-07-5
Bara I.
Begu I.[7]
7-620-66-4
Cristian J.
Juvan K.
3-67-687-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Potapova A.
6-25-77-5
Gracheva V.
Petkovic A.
6-42-66-4
Barthel M.
Bondar A.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.[6]
Pera B.
6-36-4
Peterson R.
Fett J.
6-16-3
Tsurenko L.
Prisacariu A.
7-56-2
Kalinina A.[8]
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-1
Friedsam A.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
5-76-46-4
Kontaveit A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-37-5