Matthias Bachinger vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Ismaning CH Round of 16

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Matthias Bachinger
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2021
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Bachinger M.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Bachinger M.
64662
Van Rijthoven T.
77421

Matthias Bachinger defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Ismaning CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bachinger M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Bachinger M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bachinger M.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
10.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bachinger M.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
90
Break points won·Slight edge
8
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bachinger M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Van Rijthoven T.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Otte O.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.[5]
Cressy M.[7]
7-52-67-65
Lacko L.
Halys Q.[8]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[5]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-65
Cressy M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-776-47-64
Halys Q.[8]
Forejtek J.
3-66-26-2
Lacko L.
Bachinger M.
7-53-66-4
R16
Marterer M.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Otte O.[5]
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Seppi A.[3]
4-66-47-64
Lacko L.
Machac T.[6]
6-726-47-62
Bachinger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-746-46-2
Forejtek J.
Maden Y.
7-633-66-1
Halys Q.[8]
Bemelmans R.
7-686-756-4
Cressy M.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-653-67-5
R32
Marterer M.
Vesely J.[2]
7-686-4
Rosenkranz M.
Huesler M.
6-726-27-60
Lenz J.
Ilkel C.
6-757-56-1
Seppi A.[3]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Zuk K.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
7-56-2
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-46-2
Bachinger M.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Hanfmann Y.[4]
5-77-646-4
Bemelmans R.
Squire H.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Thompson J.[1]
5-76-26-2
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-45-76-3
Otte O.[5]
Haase R.
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.
Copil M.
7-687-64
Maden Y.
Moraing M.
W/O