Filip Misolic vs Andrej Martin — Losinj CH Round of 16

Losinj CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
clay
SVK3
Andrej Martin
#392ATP
1470ELO
1444Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
Misolic F.
6-1 7-6
Martin A.
Misolic F.
67132
Martin A.
16110

Filip Misolic defeated Andrej Martin 6-1 7-6 in the Losinj CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Martin A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Martin A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Martin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
12
Break points saved·Dominant
91
54
Break points won·Dominant
53
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Martin A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+220 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1444
6.5Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1470
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.[2]
Cecchinato M.[1]
W/O
Semi-finals
Taberner C.[2]
Giannessi A.[6]
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Fatic N.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Giannessi A.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-766-1
Fatic N.
Misolic F.
7-666-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Bourgue M.[8]
6-02-67-5
Taberner C.[2]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-0
R16
Taberner C.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
7-613-66-1
Arnaboldi A.
Forejtek J.
6-33-66-4
Brancaccio R.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Giannessi A.[6]
Agamenone F.
7-673-66-1
Fatic N.
Kravchenko G.
6-32-66-3
Bourgue M.[8]
Setkic A.
6-06-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-747-646-1
Misolic F.
Martin A.[3]
6-17-611
R32
Taberner C.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.
Jianu F.
6-26-3
Forejtek J.
Cornea V.
6-46-4
Arnaboldi A.
Clarke J.[7]
6-33-66-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Milojevic N.[4]
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Kirkin E.
6-33-66-2
Agamenone F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-626-0
Kravchenko G.
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-56-2
Misolic F.
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Martin A.[3]
Poljicak M.
7-626-3
Setkic A.
Genov A.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Guinard M.
2-66-36-4
Giannessi A.[6]
Haase R.
7-647-5
Bourgue M.[8]
Petrovic D.
5-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Lopez San Martin A.
7-657-62