John Millman vs Illya Marchenko — Moscow Round of 16

Moscow · ATP · Round of 16
AUS
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
hard
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Millman J.
6-1 5-7 6-4
Marchenko I.
Millman J.
6562
Marchenko I.
1741

John Millman defeated Illya Marchenko 6-1 5-7 6-4 in the Moscow round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Millman came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. John Millman extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: John Millman came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-27SofiaR16hardJohn Millman5-7 7-6(0) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Millman J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Millman J.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Millman J.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
80
Break points won·Dominant
64
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Millman J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marchenko I.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Karatsev A.[2]
Cilic M.[6]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Karatsev A.[2]
Khachanov K.[3]
7-676-1
Cilic M.[6]
Berankis R.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Berankis R.
Mannarino A.
6-27-61
Karatsev A.[2]
Simon G.
6-46-3
Cilic M.[6]
Martinez P.
6-16-2
Khachanov K.[3]
Millman J.
7-57-64
R16
Karatsev A.[2]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-3
Simon G.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
Khachanov K.[3]
Duckworth J.
3-66-36-1
Millman J.
Marchenko I.
6-15-76-4
Cilic M.[6]
Paul T.
7-56-3
Martinez P.
Krajinovic F.[4]
6-36-4
Berankis R.
Coria F.
6-26-1
Mannarino A.
Rublev A.[1]
5-77-646-3
R32
Gerasimov E.
Kecmanovic M.
6-31-66-4
Marchenko I.
Bublik A.[5]
6-46-3
Martinez P.
Pella G.
6-20-0
Berankis R.
Donskoy E.
6-16-3
Mcdonald M.
Nishioka Y.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.
Gojo B.
3-67-56-2
Millman J.
Bonzi B.
6-756-46-3
Cilic M.[6]
Dzumhur D.
6-746-16-1
Paul T.
Ymer M.
7-677-5
Coria F.
Kachmazov A.
6-25-76-2
Mannarino A.
Safiullin R.
1-67-666-4
Simon G.
Djere L.[8]
6-737-56-3