Nerman Fatic vs Nicolas Alvarez Varona — Losinj CH Round of 32

Losinj CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
clay
ESP
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
#481ATP
1353ELO
1301Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLL
Fatic N.
7-5 6-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Fatic N.
762
Alvarez Varona N.
520

Nerman Fatic defeated Nicolas Alvarez Varona 7-5 6-2 in the Losinj CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Alvarez Varona N.

Alvarez Varona N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Alvarez Varona N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Alvarez Varona N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
40
Break points won·Clear edge
36
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
24
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Alvarez Varona N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+177 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1301
7.1Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1353
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.[2]
Cecchinato M.[1]
W/O
Semi-finals
Taberner C.[2]
Giannessi A.[6]
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Fatic N.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Giannessi A.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-766-1
Fatic N.
Misolic F.
7-666-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Bourgue M.[8]
6-02-67-5
Taberner C.[2]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-0
R16
Taberner C.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
7-613-66-1
Arnaboldi A.
Forejtek J.
6-33-66-4
Brancaccio R.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Giannessi A.[6]
Agamenone F.
7-673-66-1
Fatic N.
Kravchenko G.
6-32-66-3
Bourgue M.[8]
Setkic A.
6-06-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-747-646-1
Misolic F.
Martin A.[3]
6-17-611
R32
Taberner C.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.
Jianu F.
6-26-3
Forejtek J.
Cornea V.
6-46-4
Arnaboldi A.
Clarke J.[7]
6-33-66-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Milojevic N.[4]
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Kirkin E.
6-33-66-2
Agamenone F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-626-0
Kravchenko G.
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-56-2
Misolic F.
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Martin A.[3]
Poljicak M.
7-626-3
Setkic A.
Genov A.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Guinard M.
2-66-36-4
Giannessi A.[6]
Haase R.
7-647-5
Bourgue M.[8]
Petrovic D.
5-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Lopez San Martin A.
7-657-62