Carlos Taberner vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Losinj CH Round of 32

Losinj CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP2
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Taberner C.
6-4 6-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Taberner C.
662
Barranco Cosano J.
430

Carlos Taberner defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-4 6-3 in the Losinj CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
14
Break points saved·Even
74
70
Break points won·Dominant
59
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Barranco Cosano J.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.0+163 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1441
6.9Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1457
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.[2]
Cecchinato M.[1]
W/O
Semi-finals
Taberner C.[2]
Giannessi A.[6]
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.[1]
Fatic N.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Giannessi A.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-766-1
Fatic N.
Misolic F.
7-666-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Bourgue M.[8]
6-02-67-5
Taberner C.[2]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-0
R16
Taberner C.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
7-613-66-1
Arnaboldi A.
Forejtek J.
6-33-66-4
Brancaccio R.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Giannessi A.[6]
Agamenone F.
7-673-66-1
Fatic N.
Kravchenko G.
6-32-66-3
Bourgue M.[8]
Setkic A.
6-06-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-747-646-1
Misolic F.
Martin A.[3]
6-17-611
R32
Taberner C.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.
Jianu F.
6-26-3
Forejtek J.
Cornea V.
6-46-4
Arnaboldi A.
Clarke J.[7]
6-33-66-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Milojevic N.[4]
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Kirkin E.
6-33-66-2
Agamenone F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-626-0
Kravchenko G.
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-56-2
Misolic F.
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Martin A.[3]
Poljicak M.
7-626-3
Setkic A.
Genov A.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Guinard M.
2-66-36-4
Giannessi A.[6]
Haase R.
7-647-5
Bourgue M.[8]
Petrovic D.
5-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Lopez San Martin A.
7-657-62