Alize Cornet vs Stefanie Voegele — Tenerife Round of 32

Tenerife · WTA · Round of 32
FRA
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
hard
SUI
Stefanie Voegele
36 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Cornet A.
6-1 6-2
Voegele S.
Cornet A.
662
Voegele S.
120

Alize Cornet defeated Stefanie Voegele 6-1 6-2 in the Tenerife round of 32 on hard. Alize Cornet extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-12-16LimogesR32hardAlize Cornet6-2 6-1
2018-04-09LuganoR16clayStefanie Voegele2-6 7-5 6-3
2014-02-10DohaR64hardStefanie Voegele7-6(6) 7-5
2010-03-22MiamiR128hardAlize Cornet6-3 0-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Cornet A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Voegele S.

Voegele S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cornet A.Voegele S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
55%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cornet A.Voegele S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
0
Break points saved·Dominant
57
14
Break points won·Dominant
83
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
47
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cornet A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Voegele S.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Li A.
Osorio C.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Osorio C.
Giorgi C.[4]
6-47-5
Li A.
Cornet A.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Zheng S.
7-56-1
Giorgi C.[4]
Rus A.
6-16-1
Li A.
Begu I.
7-57-5
Cornet A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-3
R16
Cornet A.
Wang X.
6-16-754-1
Rus A.
Minnen G.
6-16-2
Schmiedlova A.
Cristian J.
6-27-5
Li A.
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Osorio C.
Sherif M.
6-46-2
Zheng S.
Tauson C.[7]
7-642-66-4
Giorgi C.[4]
Kovinic D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Vekic D.
4-66-27-64
R32
Osorio C.
Svitolina E.[1]
5-76-36-2
Minnen G.
Minella M.
7-57-62
Zheng S.
Masarova R.
6-46-2
Tauson C.[7]
Watson H.
6-42-67-66
Cristian J.
Zidansek T.[2]
7-54-66-1
Sherif M.
Stefanini L.
6-26-0
Begu I.
Kostyuk M.
6-46-4
Cornet A.
Voegele S.
6-16-2
Li A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
2-66-46-1
Wang X.
Zhang S.[6]
6-26-1
Giorgi C.[4]
Bolsova A.
7-643-66-4
Kovinic D.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-36-3
Rus A.
Golubic V.[5]
6-36-4
Vekic D.
Riske Amritraj A.[8]
6-16-4
Gracheva V.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-45-77-64
Schmiedlova A.
Juvan K.
4-66-16-4