Lloyd Harris vs Zizou Bergs — Antwerp Round of 32

Antwerp · ATP · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA7
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 October 2021
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Harris L.
7-6 6-3
Bergs Z.
Harris L.
7762
Bergs Z.
6430

Lloyd Harris defeated Zizou Bergs 7-6 6-3 in the Antwerp round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, defending last year's round of 16. Lloyd Harris extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonR128grassLloyd Harris7-6(7) 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Harris L.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.4
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
69
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Even
24
21
Deciding sets·Even
94
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Bergs Z.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1640
Surface ELO
6.3+117 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1808
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.2
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Harris L.Bergs Z.
Freshness·
—
79

Bergs Z.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
12°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 74%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Schwartzman D.[2]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Schwartzman D.[2]
Brooksby J.
6-46-0
Sinner J.[1]
Harris L.[7]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-0
Schwartzman D.[2]
Nakashima B.
6-46-2
Harris L.[7]
Fucsovics M.
6-27-5
Sinner J.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-46-2
R16
Harris L.[7]
Struff J.
6-26-3
Schwartzman D.[2]
Murray A.
6-47-66
Nakashima B.
Laaksonen H.
7-656-756-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Garin C.[3]
4-66-36-3
Brooksby J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-26-0
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
6-756-36-1
Rinderknech A.
Lajovic D.[8]
6-34-66-2
Sinner J.[1]
Musetti L.
7-56-2
R32
Murray A.
Tiafoe F.
7-626-777-68
Musetti L.
Mager G.
7-627-63
Laaksonen H.
Paire B.
4-66-06-3
Nakashima B.
De Minaur A.[6]
6-46-0
Davidovich Fokina A.
Thompson J.
6-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Popyrin A.
6-43-66-0
Brooksby J.
Opelka R.[5]
6-46-4
Harris L.[7]
Bergs Z.
7-646-3
Struff J.
Ramos A.
6-33-66-3
Fucsovics M.
Novak D.
7-646-2
Lajovic D.[8]
Gasquet R.
7-636-1
Rinderknech A.
Delbonis F.
6-46-4