Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Peter Polansky — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
CAN
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 6-3
Polansky P.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Polansky P.
33–

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Peter Polansky 6-3 6-3 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Botic Van De Zandschulp extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Polansky P.
41
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
82
Break points won·Dominant
68
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Polansky P.
Freshness·
95
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Tabilo A.
Donskoy E.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Ilkel C.
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.
Celikbilek A.
6-37-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Couacaud E.
7-56-726-2
Escobedo E.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Karlovic I.
6-37-67
Vukic A.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Q1
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-3
Tabilo A.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Escobedo E.
Istomin D.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Diez S.
5-2
Vukic A.
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.
6-46-2
Couacaud E.
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Cressy M.
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.
6-33-67-69
Marcora R.
Bolt A.
6-757-656-2
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-66-4
Karlovic I.
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Gomez E.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sousa J.
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Eubanks C.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.
6-33-65-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Nanda G.
Krueger M.
0-67-6107-5
Olivo R.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Kubler J.
6-06-3