Joao Sousa vs Victor Lilov — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
POR15
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
USA
Victor Lilov
#1022ATP
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLL
Sousa J.
6-2 6-0
Lilov V.
Sousa J.
662
Lilov V.
200

Joao Sousa defeated Victor Lilov 6-2 6-0 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sousa J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lilov V.

Lilov V.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Serve advantage — Sousa J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sousa J.Lilov V.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (178 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sousa J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lilov V.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.9
Country comfort
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
35°COvercast
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 12%
Q2
Escobedo E.[13]
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-26-4
Vukic A.[24]
Fratangelo B.[12]
6-16-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Tabilo A.[17]
Donskoy E.[6]
6-26-1
Olivo R.[22]
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Cressy M.[4]
Couacaud E.[18]
7-56-726-2
Gomez E.[11]
Karlovic I.[23]
6-37-67
Ilkel C.[14]
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.[20]
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.[15]
Celikbilek A.[10]
6-37-5
Caruso S.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Q1
Caruso S.[2]
Kubler J.
6-06-3
Sousa J.[15]
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.[10]
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Fratangelo B.[12]
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Vukic A.[24]
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-33-66-3
Gomez E.[11]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[22]
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[18]
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[14]
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.[21]
6-46-2
Tabilo A.[17]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Cressy M.[4]
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.[9]
6-33-65-2
Kukushkin M.[5]
Diez S.
5-2
Donskoy E.[6]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Karlovic I.[23]
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Nanda G.
Krueger M.[8]
0-67-6107-5
Marcora R.
Bolt A.[3]
6-757-656-2
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.[16]
6-33-67-69
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.[19]
6-43-66-4
Eubanks C.[20]
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Escobedo E.[13]
Istomin D.
6-36-2