Facundo Mena vs Nicolas Kicker — Santiago 1 CH Round of 16

Santiago 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Mena F.
6-4 6-4
Kicker N.
Mena F.
662
Kicker N.
440

Facundo Mena defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-4 6-4 in the Santiago 1 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Mena edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
9
30
Break points saved·Even
57
56
Break points won·Dominant
7
45
Deciding sets·Even
28
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+32 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Clay Elo 1373
6.0Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1385
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.3
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.8
Minutes 14d
6.0
0.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Kicker N.
Freshness·Dominant
70
100

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[3]
Baez S.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-36-786-3
Baez S.[5]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[2]
Lama G.
7-666-4
Varillas J.[3]
Melzer G.
6-16-3
Jarry N.
Dellien H.[4]
7-646-4
Baez S.[5]
Mena F.
6-36-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[2]
Gautier A.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Oliveira G.
6-43-67-5
Varillas J.[3]
Lenz J.
6-26-4
Melzer G.
Tirante T.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-747-56-4
Dellien H.[4]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-24-66-2
Baez S.[5]
Chappell N.
5-76-46-1
Mena F.
Kicker N.
6-46-4
R32
Cerundolo F.[2]
Rodriguez C.
6-33-66-2
Gautier A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-16-3
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lenz J.
Nunez V.
6-06-2
Melzer G.
Andreozzi G.
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Londero J.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-35-76-1
Jarry N.
Ficovich J.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alvarez N.
7-56-1
Dellien H.[4]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-3
Baez S.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-27-5
Chappell N.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Cid R.
6-46-727-5
Kicker N.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-06-1
Varillas J.[3]
Casanova H.
7-687-67