Stefan Kozlov vs Jason Jung — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Retired
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Kozlov S.
6-3 3-6 5-2
Jung J.
Kozlov S.
6352
Jung J.
3621

Stefan Kozlov advanced when Jason Jung retired 6-3 3-6 5-2 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1. Stefan Kozlov extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardStefan Kozlov6-3 3-6 5-2 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Kozlov S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kozlov S.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kozlov S.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
64
Break points won·Clear edge
20
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kozlov S.Jung J.
Freshness·Slight edge
69
78

Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Tabilo A.
Donskoy E.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Ilkel C.
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.
Celikbilek A.
6-37-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Couacaud E.
7-56-726-2
Escobedo E.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Karlovic I.
6-37-67
Vukic A.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Q1
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-3
Tabilo A.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Escobedo E.
Istomin D.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Diez S.
5-2
Vukic A.
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.
6-46-2
Couacaud E.
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Cressy M.
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.
6-33-67-69
Marcora R.
Bolt A.
6-757-656-2
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-66-4
Karlovic I.
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Gomez E.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sousa J.
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Eubanks C.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.
6-33-65-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Nanda G.
Krueger M.
0-67-6107-5
Olivo R.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Kubler J.
6-06-3