Cem Ilkel vs Govind Nanda — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 2

Indian Wells Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
Ilkel C.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Nanda G.
Ilkel C.
6262
Nanda G.
1641

Cem Ilkel defeated Govind Nanda 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. Cem Ilkel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ2hardCem Ilkel6-1 2-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Nanda G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Nanda G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Nanda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
5
Break points saved·Slight edge
49
38
Break points won·Clear edge
3
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
15
Tiebreaks·
66
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Tabilo A.
Donskoy E.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Ilkel C.
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.
Celikbilek A.
6-37-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Couacaud E.
7-56-726-2
Escobedo E.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Karlovic I.
6-37-67
Vukic A.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Q1
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-3
Tabilo A.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Escobedo E.
Istomin D.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Diez S.
5-2
Vukic A.
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.
6-46-2
Couacaud E.
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Cressy M.
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.
6-33-67-69
Marcora R.
Bolt A.
6-757-656-2
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-66-4
Karlovic I.
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Gomez E.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sousa J.
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Eubanks C.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.
6-33-65-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Nanda G.
Krueger M.
0-67-6107-5
Olivo R.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Kubler J.
6-06-3