Maxime Cressy vs Enzo Couacaud — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 2

Indian Wells Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
Cressy M.
7-5 6-7 6-2
Couacaud E.
Cressy M.
76262
Couacaud E.
57721

Maxime Cressy defeated Enzo Couacaud 7-5 6-7 6-2 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Maxime Cressy came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Maxime Cressy extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ2hardMaxime Cressy7-5 6-7(2) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Couacaud E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Couacaud E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Couacaud E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
47
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
79
Break points won·Dominant
2
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
8
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Tabilo A.
Donskoy E.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Ilkel C.
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.
Celikbilek A.
6-37-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Cressy M.
Couacaud E.
7-56-726-2
Escobedo E.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Karlovic I.
6-37-67
Vukic A.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Q1
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-3
Tabilo A.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Escobedo E.
Istomin D.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Diez S.
5-2
Vukic A.
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.
6-46-2
Couacaud E.
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Cressy M.
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.
6-33-67-69
Marcora R.
Bolt A.
6-757-656-2
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.
6-43-66-4
Karlovic I.
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Gomez E.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sousa J.
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Eubanks C.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.
6-33-65-2
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Nanda G.
Krueger M.
0-67-6107-5
Olivo R.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Kubler J.
6-06-3