Javier Barranco Cosano vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Barcelona CH Round of 32

Barcelona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 4 October 2021
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP3
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Barranco Cosano J.
6-2 1-0
Zapata Miralles B.
Barranco Cosano J.
61–
Zapata Miralles B.
20–

Javier Barranco Cosano advanced when Bernabe Zapata Miralles retired 6-2 1-0 in the Barcelona CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
49
Break points saved·Even
70
74
Break points won·Dominant
33
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
56
Tiebreaks·Even
7
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Zapata Miralles B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+34 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1407
5.5Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
7.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kuzmanov D.
Gaston H.[1]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Gaston H.[1]
Muller A.
6-20-66-0
Kuzmanov D.
Molcan A.[2]
7-57-65
Quarter-finals
Kuzmanov D.
Gabashvili T.
6-26-0
Muller A.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Gaston H.[1]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-1
Molcan A.[2]
Kuhn N.
6-36-2
R16
Kuhn N.
Milojevic N.[5]
7-56-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dzumhur D.[4]
6-46-4
Gabashvili T.
Borges N.
7-667-5
Martineau M.
Popko D.
7-626-2
Muller A.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Horansky F.
6-46-3
Gaston H.[1]
Krutykh O.
6-06-2
Molcan A.[2]
Skatov T.
6-17-66
R32
Molcan A.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-16-3
Kuhn N.
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[4]
Kravchenko G.
3-66-36-1
Kuzmanov D.
Robredo T.
6-06-1
Gabashvili T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-2
Martineau M.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-3
Popko D.
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Alvarez Varona N.
Lehecka J.[8]
6-27-61
Horansky F.
Marterer M.
6-42-67-5
Krutykh O.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-26-2
Gaston H.[1]
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Milojevic N.[5]
Oliel Y.
7-50-66-4
Skatov T.
Guinard M.
3-67-646-1
Muller A.
Andreev A.
6-44-1
Barranco Cosano J.
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-21-0
Borges N.
Lopez San Martin A.
6-16-0