Nick Chappell vs Diego Fernandez Flores — Santiago 1 CH Round of 32

Santiago 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
clay
CHI
Diego Fernandez Flores
#1047ATP
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLW
Chappell N.
6-3 3-6 7-5
Fernandez Flores D.
Chappell N.
6372
Fernandez Flores D.
3651

Nick Chappell defeated Diego Fernandez Flores 6-3 3-6 7-5 in the Santiago 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Chappell closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chappell N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fernandez Flores D.

Fernandez Flores D.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chappell N.Fernandez Flores D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
53%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
47%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
0.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chappell N.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fernandez Flores D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[3]
Baez S.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-36-786-3
Baez S.[5]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[2]
Lama G.
7-666-4
Varillas J.[3]
Melzer G.
6-16-3
Jarry N.
Dellien H.[4]
7-646-4
Baez S.[5]
Mena F.
6-36-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[2]
Gautier A.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Oliveira G.
6-43-67-5
Varillas J.[3]
Lenz J.
6-26-4
Melzer G.
Tirante T.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-747-56-4
Dellien H.[4]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-24-66-2
Baez S.[5]
Chappell N.
5-76-46-1
Mena F.
Kicker N.
6-46-4
R32
Cerundolo F.[2]
Rodriguez C.
6-33-66-2
Gautier A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-16-3
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lenz J.
Nunez V.
6-06-2
Melzer G.
Andreozzi G.
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Londero J.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-35-76-1
Jarry N.
Ficovich J.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alvarez N.
7-56-1
Dellien H.[4]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-3
Baez S.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-27-5
Chappell N.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Cid R.
6-46-727-5
Kicker N.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-06-1
Varillas J.[3]
Casanova H.
7-687-67