Altug Celikbilek vs Thomas Fabbiano — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
TUR10
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Celikbilek A.
2-6 6-2 6-1
Fabbiano T.
Celikbilek A.
2662
Fabbiano T.
6211

Altug Celikbilek defeated Thomas Fabbiano 2-6 6-2 6-1 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
81
Break points won·Clear edge
38
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fabbiano T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.7
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
4.9
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
35°COvercast
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 12%
Q2
Escobedo E.[13]
Kukushkin M.[5]
6-26-4
Vukic A.[24]
Fratangelo B.[12]
6-16-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-44-66-2
Tabilo A.[17]
Donskoy E.[6]
6-26-1
Olivo R.[22]
Arnaboldi A.
6-16-766-3
Cressy M.[4]
Couacaud E.[18]
7-56-726-2
Gomez E.[11]
Karlovic I.[23]
6-37-67
Ilkel C.[14]
Nanda G.
6-12-66-4
Eubanks C.[20]
Kozlov S.
2-66-07-5
Sousa J.[15]
Celikbilek A.[10]
6-37-5
Caruso S.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Q1
Caruso S.[2]
Kubler J.
6-06-3
Sousa J.[15]
Lilov V.
6-26-0
Celikbilek A.[10]
Fabbiano T.
2-66-26-1
Fratangelo B.[12]
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Vukic A.[24]
Blanch U.
6-27-5
Arnaboldi A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-33-66-3
Gomez E.[11]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[22]
Mochizuki S.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[18]
Harrison C.
6-35-77-62
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Polansky P.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[14]
Janvier M.
6-26-747-64
Kwiatkowski T.
Gulbis E.[21]
6-46-2
Tabilo A.[17]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Cressy M.[4]
Moriya H.
6-44-66-3
Kozlov S.
Jung J.[9]
6-33-65-2
Kukushkin M.[5]
Diez S.
5-2
Donskoy E.[6]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-7107-627-5
Karlovic I.[23]
Schnur B.
4-67-657-67
Nanda G.
Krueger M.[8]
0-67-6107-5
Marcora R.
Bolt A.[3]
6-757-656-2
Viola M.
Kokkinakis T.[16]
6-33-67-69
Quiroz R.
Ramanathan R.[19]
6-43-66-4
Eubanks C.[20]
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Escobedo E.[13]
Istomin D.
6-36-2