Sebastian Baez vs Facundo Mena — Santiago 1 CH Quarter-final

Santiago 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sebastian Baez
ARG5
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Baez S.
6-3 6-1
Mena F.
Baez S.
662
Mena F.
310

Sebastian Baez defeated Facundo Mena 6-3 6-1 in the Santiago 1 CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Mena F.
7
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Mena F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
9
Break points saved·Dominant
96
57
Break points won·Dominant
86
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Mena F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+312 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1406
8.9Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1427
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.7
Surface form
7.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
2.8
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[3]
Baez S.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-36-786-3
Baez S.[5]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[2]
Lama G.
7-666-4
Varillas J.[3]
Melzer G.
6-16-3
Jarry N.
Dellien H.[4]
7-646-4
Baez S.[5]
Mena F.
6-36-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[2]
Gautier A.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Oliveira G.
6-43-67-5
Varillas J.[3]
Lenz J.
6-26-4
Melzer G.
Tirante T.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-747-56-4
Dellien H.[4]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-24-66-2
Baez S.[5]
Chappell N.
5-76-46-1
Mena F.
Kicker N.
6-46-4
R32
Cerundolo F.[2]
Rodriguez C.
6-33-66-2
Gautier A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-16-3
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lenz J.
Nunez V.
6-06-2
Melzer G.
Andreozzi G.
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Londero J.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-35-76-1
Jarry N.
Ficovich J.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alvarez N.
7-56-1
Dellien H.[4]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-3
Baez S.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-27-5
Chappell N.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Cid R.
6-46-727-5
Kicker N.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-06-1
Varillas J.[3]
Casanova H.
7-687-67