Gerald Melzer vs Guido Andreozzi — Santiago 1 CH Round of 32

Santiago 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT
Gerald Melzer
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 2021
clay
ARG
Guido Andreozzi
#1536ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
Melzer G.
6-2 6-4
Andreozzi G.
Melzer G.
662
Andreozzi G.
240

Gerald Melzer defeated Guido Andreozzi 6-2 6-4 in the Santiago 1 CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gerald Melzer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Gerald Melzer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-13Buenos AiresR16clayGerald Melzer7-6(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Andreozzi G.

Andreozzi G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Melzer G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Melzer G.Andreozzi G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Melzer G.Andreozzi G.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
66
Break points won·Even
20
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
53
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Melzer G.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Andreozzi G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
3.8
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.[3]
Baez S.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Varillas J.[3]
Cerundolo F.[2]
6-36-786-3
Baez S.[5]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[2]
Lama G.
7-666-4
Varillas J.[3]
Melzer G.
6-16-3
Jarry N.
Dellien H.[4]
7-646-4
Baez S.[5]
Mena F.
6-36-1
R16
Cerundolo F.[2]
Gautier A.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Oliveira G.
6-43-67-5
Varillas J.[3]
Lenz J.
6-26-4
Melzer G.
Tirante T.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-747-56-4
Dellien H.[4]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-24-66-2
Baez S.[5]
Chappell N.
5-76-46-1
Mena F.
Kicker N.
6-46-4
R32
Cerundolo F.[2]
Rodriguez C.
6-33-66-2
Gautier A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-16-3
Oliveira G.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
Lama G.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lenz J.
Nunez V.
6-06-2
Melzer G.
Andreozzi G.
6-26-4
Tirante T.
Londero J.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-35-76-1
Jarry N.
Ficovich J.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alvarez N.
7-56-1
Dellien H.[4]
Catarina L.
4-66-36-3
Baez S.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-27-5
Chappell N.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-33-67-5
Mena F.
Cid R.
6-46-727-5
Kicker N.
Cerundolo J.[1]
6-06-1
Varillas J.[3]
Casanova H.
7-687-67