Johan Nikles vs Renzo Olivo — Lima 1 CH Quarter-final

Lima 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
clay
Renzo Olivo
ARG6
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Nikles J.
6-3 6-1
Olivo R.
Nikles J.
662
Olivo R.
310

Johan Nikles defeated Renzo Olivo 6-3 6-1 in the Lima 1 CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nikles J.serving51% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving51% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nikles J.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
55%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.2
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nikles J.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Even
7
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
22
33
Break points won·Clear edge
30
15
Deciding sets·Even
29
27
Tiebreaks·
—
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nikles J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Olivo R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[5]
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Melzer G.
6-17-5
Dellien H.[5]
Nikles J.
6-756-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Cerundolo J.[2]
3-66-42-0
Dellien H.[5]
Kicker N.
7-56-2
Nikles J.
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-1
Melzer G.
Esteve Lobato E.
6-23-0
R16
Cerundolo J.[2]
Lama G.
6-17-63
Esteve Lobato E.
Varillas J.[4]
6-37-63
Melzer G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-47-65
Dellien H.[5]
Mena F.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Altmaier D.[3]
2-66-26-4
Nikles J.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-626-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Lenz J.
7-56-3
Olivo R.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-56-4
R32
Lama G.
Tirante T.
6-33-66-1
Lenz J.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Mejia N.
6-36-0
Roca Batalla O.
Barrientos N.
7-57-62
Melzer G.
Ficovich J.[7]
6-37-62
Dellien H.[5]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Mena F.
Alvarez N.
6-36-756-3
Kicker N.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-42-66-4
Altmaier D.[3]
Andreozzi G.
7-656-736-2
Olivo R.[6]
Catarina L.
6-46-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Cerundolo F.[1]
6-26-4
Nikles J.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-46-2
Cerundolo J.[2]
Bueno G.
6-16-3
Esteve Lobato E.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-1
Varillas J.[4]
Sakamoto P.
6-10-0
Quiroz R.
Olivieri G.
4-66-30-0