Tereza Martincova vs Camila Osorio — Chicago 2 Round of 64

Chicago 2 · WTA · Round of 64
Tereza Martincova
CZE
Tereza Martincova
#283WTA
1589ELO
1573Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#68WTA
1807ELO
1780Hard ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Martincova T.
6-3 7-5
Osorio C.
Martincova T.
672
Osorio C.
350

Tereza Martincova defeated Camila Osorio 6-3 7-5 in the Chicago 2 round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Camila Osorio came in ranked #68, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Tereza Martincova claimed a first win over Camila Osorio in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-19RabatR32clayCamila Osorio0-6 4-6
2021-04-05BogotaR16clayCamila Osorio6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Martincova T.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Osorio C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Martincova T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Martincova T.Osorio C.
—
Serve
10
—
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Martincova T.Osorio C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
73%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
47%
Break points saved·Even
53%
53%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martincova T.Osorio C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
84
Break points saved·Dominant
36
73
Break points won·Dominant
67
99
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
41
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martincova T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Osorio C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
2.3Hard Elo 1573
Surface ELO
7.7+207 Hard Elo edge
2.1Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
7.9Overall Elo 1807
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martincova T.Osorio C.
Freshness·
—
94

Osorio C.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muguruza G.[2]
Jabeur O.[6]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[6]
Rybakina E.[5]
6-43-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Vondrousova M.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Vondrousova M.
Collins D.[10]
6-746-07-63
Jabeur O.[6]
Svitolina E.[1]
6-46-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Rybakina E.[5]
Bencic B.[3]
6-43-1
R16
Muguruza G.[2]
Azarenka V.[14]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Ruse E.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[6]
Pegula J.[9]
1-66-26-3
Bencic B.[3]
Martincova T.
6-27-65
Rybakina E.[5]
Kudermetova V.[12]
7-647-5
Collins D.[10]
Mertens E.[7]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.
Teichmann J.[16]
6-46-3
Hontama M.
Rogers S.
6-46-716-1
R32
Vondrousova M.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[4]
6-36-2
Teichmann J.[16]
Linette M.
6-26-4
Hontama M.
Kontaveit A.[11]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Ruse E.
Baindl K.
7-56-2
Pegula J.[9]
Petkovic A.
6-27-5
Jabeur O.[6]
Hsieh S.
6-16-0
Bencic B.[3]
Inglis M.
5-76-16-0
Martincova T.
Zidansek T.[13]
6-27-5
Kudermetova V.[12]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[5]
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Mertens E.[7]
Yastremska D.
6-16-3
Collins D.[10]
Doi M.
4-66-37-5
Rogers S.
Andreescu B.[8]
6-47-5
Azarenka V.[14]
Baptiste H.
6-24-66-3
Muguruza G.[2]
Li A.
6-46-4
R64
Baindl K.
Kostyuk M.
6-726-36-0
Doi M.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-746-3
Sasnovich A.
Keys M.
6-42-0
Hsieh S.
Clijsters K.
6-35-76-3
Petkovic A.
Govortsova O.
6-26-2
Vondrousova M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-1
Hontama M.
Garcia C.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.[16]
Kanepi K.
7-637-5
Ruse E.
Giorgi C.[15]
6-46-2
Anisimova A.
Golubic V.
6-05-76-4
Pegula J.[9]
Frech M.
6-36-0
Collins D.[10]
Flipkens K.
6-46-2
Inglis M.
Dolehide C.
4-66-26-4
Zidansek T.[13]
Stephens S.
6-26-1
Dart H.
Haddad Maia B.
6-13-66-1
Linette M.
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-4
Rogers S.
Cabrera L.
6-26-1
Kontaveit A.[11]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Azarenka V.[14]
Zhang S.
6-26-1
Baptiste H.
Paolini J.
7-56-3
Li A.
Vekic D.
6-36-1
Kudermetova V.[12]
Kalinskaya A.
7-684-66-2
Martincova T.
Osorio C.
6-37-5
Yastremska D.
Cornet A.
7-56-1