Richard Gasquet vs Matteo Viola — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA4
Richard Gasquet
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Gasquet R.
6-7 6-1 6-0
Viola M.
Gasquet R.
64662
Viola M.
77101

Richard Gasquet defeated Matteo Viola 6-7 6-1 6-0 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gasquet R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gasquet R.

Serve advantage — Gasquet R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gasquet R.Viola M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gasquet R.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
8
Break points saved·Dominant
97
20
Break points won·Clear edge
49
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gasquet R.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Viola M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.
Novak D.
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.
Vesely J.[5]
6-36-3
Novak D.
Moutet C.[6]
6-727-666-4
Quarter-finals
Laaksonen H.
Rune H.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[5]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-766-46-2
Moutet C.[6]
Grenier H.
6-47-65
Novak D.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-66
R16
Laaksonen H.
Bonzi B.[2]
7-666-4
Rune H.
Berankis R.
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Pouille L.
3-67-656-3
Vesely J.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-1
Grenier H.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-46-2
Novak D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[6]
Safiullin R.
6-42-67-67
Bemelmans R.
Herbert P.[8]
3-67-56-4
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Mayot H.
6-16-3
Laaksonen H.
Bergs Z.
6-36-1
Berankis R.
Schnur B.
6-706-46-2
Rune H.
Simon G.[7]
6-46-0
Gasquet R.[4]
Viola M.
6-746-16-0
Pouille L.
Ymer E.
6-33-66-1
Tabilo A.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Grenier H.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Hoang A.
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[8]
Masur D.
6-756-36-2
Bemelmans R.
Sousa J.
6-44-66-4
Novak D.
Barrere G.
7-57-5
Moutet C.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-616-1
Halys Q.
Humbert U.[1]
7-6126-4
Vesely J.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-757-607-63