Benjamin Bonzi vs Harold Mayot — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA2
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Bonzi B.
6-1 6-3
Mayot H.
Bonzi B.
662
Mayot H.
130

Benjamin Bonzi defeated Harold Mayot 6-1 6-3 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Benjamin Bonzi came in ranked #102. Benjamin Bonzi claimed a first win over Harold Mayot in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonR128grassHarold Mayot6-3 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Bonzi B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bonzi B.Mayot H.
27
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bonzi B.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bonzi B.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
29
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Slight edge
27
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bonzi B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mayot H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+165 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1548
6.7Overall Elo 1749
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1571
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bonzi B.Mayot H.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mayot H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.
Novak D.
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.
Vesely J.[5]
6-36-3
Novak D.
Moutet C.[6]
6-727-666-4
Quarter-finals
Laaksonen H.
Rune H.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[5]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-766-46-2
Moutet C.[6]
Grenier H.
6-47-65
Novak D.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-66
R16
Laaksonen H.
Bonzi B.[2]
7-666-4
Rune H.
Berankis R.
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Pouille L.
3-67-656-3
Vesely J.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-1
Grenier H.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-46-2
Novak D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[6]
Safiullin R.
6-42-67-67
Bemelmans R.
Herbert P.[8]
3-67-56-4
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Mayot H.
6-16-3
Laaksonen H.
Bergs Z.
6-36-1
Berankis R.
Schnur B.
6-706-46-2
Rune H.
Simon G.[7]
6-46-0
Gasquet R.[4]
Viola M.
6-746-16-0
Pouille L.
Ymer E.
6-33-66-1
Tabilo A.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Grenier H.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Hoang A.
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[8]
Masur D.
6-756-36-2
Bemelmans R.
Sousa J.
6-44-66-4
Novak D.
Barrere G.
7-57-5
Moutet C.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-616-1
Halys Q.
Humbert U.[1]
7-6126-4
Vesely J.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-757-607-63