Holger Rune vs Ricardas Berankis — Orleans CH Round of 16

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
LTU
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Rune H.
6-2 6-4
Berankis R.
Rune H.
662
Berankis R.
240

Holger Rune defeated Ricardas Berankis 6-2 6-4 in the Orleans CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Berankis R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rune H.Berankis R.
47
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Berankis R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Berankis R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
84
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Berankis R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.4
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.
Novak D.
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.
Vesely J.[5]
6-36-3
Novak D.
Moutet C.[6]
6-727-666-4
Quarter-finals
Laaksonen H.
Rune H.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[5]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-766-46-2
Moutet C.[6]
Grenier H.
6-47-65
Novak D.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-66
R16
Laaksonen H.
Bonzi B.[2]
7-666-4
Rune H.
Berankis R.
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Pouille L.
3-67-656-3
Vesely J.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-1
Grenier H.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-46-2
Novak D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[6]
Safiullin R.
6-42-67-67
Bemelmans R.
Herbert P.[8]
3-67-56-4
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Mayot H.
6-16-3
Laaksonen H.
Bergs Z.
6-36-1
Berankis R.
Schnur B.
6-706-46-2
Rune H.
Simon G.[7]
6-46-0
Gasquet R.[4]
Viola M.
6-746-16-0
Pouille L.
Ymer E.
6-33-66-1
Tabilo A.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Grenier H.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Hoang A.
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[8]
Masur D.
6-756-36-2
Bemelmans R.
Sousa J.
6-44-66-4
Novak D.
Barrere G.
7-57-5
Moutet C.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-616-1
Halys Q.
Humbert U.[1]
7-6126-4
Vesely J.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-757-607-63