Ruben Bemelmans vs Joao Sousa — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Bemelmans R.
6-4 4-6 6-4
Sousa J.
Bemelmans R.
6462
Sousa J.
4641

Ruben Bemelmans defeated Joao Sousa 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ruben Bemelmans came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Ruben Bemelmans extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Ruben Bemelmans edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-10-16AntwerpQFhardRuben Bemelmans4-6 7-6(2) 6-4
2016-02-01MontpellierR32hardRuben Bemelmans6-4 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Bemelmans R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bemelmans R.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bemelmans R.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
35
Break points saved·Even
87
91
Break points won·Slight edge
7
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
48
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
9
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bemelmans R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
5.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.
Novak D.
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.
Vesely J.[5]
6-36-3
Novak D.
Moutet C.[6]
6-727-666-4
Quarter-finals
Laaksonen H.
Rune H.
6-36-4
Vesely J.[5]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-766-46-2
Moutet C.[6]
Grenier H.
6-47-65
Novak D.
Bemelmans R.
7-667-66
R16
Laaksonen H.
Bonzi B.[2]
7-666-4
Rune H.
Berankis R.
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Pouille L.
3-67-656-3
Vesely J.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-1
Grenier H.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-46-2
Novak D.
Halys Q.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[6]
Safiullin R.
6-42-67-67
Bemelmans R.
Herbert P.[8]
3-67-56-4
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Mayot H.
6-16-3
Laaksonen H.
Bergs Z.
6-36-1
Berankis R.
Schnur B.
6-706-46-2
Rune H.
Simon G.[7]
6-46-0
Gasquet R.[4]
Viola M.
6-746-16-0
Pouille L.
Ymer E.
6-33-66-1
Tabilo A.
Marcora R.
6-16-3
Safiullin R.
Gulbis E.
6-36-2
Grenier H.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Hoang A.
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[8]
Masur D.
6-756-36-2
Bemelmans R.
Sousa J.
6-44-66-4
Novak D.
Barrere G.
7-57-5
Moutet C.[6]
Jacquet K.
7-616-1
Halys Q.
Humbert U.[1]
7-6126-4
Vesely J.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-757-607-63