Petra Kvitova vs Jil Teichmann — Ostrava Quarter-final

Ostrava · WTA · Quarter-final
CZE2
Petra Kvitova
#1219WTA
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 September 2021
hard
Jil Teichmann
SUI
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Kvitova P.
6-4 6-4
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
662
Teichmann J.
440

Petra Kvitova defeated Jil Teichmann 6-4 6-4 in the Ostrava quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jil Teichmann came in ranked #119, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Petra Kvitova narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Petra Kvitova edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-15CincinnatiR64hardPetra Kvitova6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-3
2022-04-28MadridR64clayJil Teichmann6-3 7-5
2021-03-07DubaiR32hardJil Teichmann6-2 3-4 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Kvitova P.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kvitova P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kvitova P.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kvitova P.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
71
Break points won·Even
88
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
32
Tiebreaks·Even
92
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kvitova P.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Teichmann J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kvitova P.Teichmann J.
Freshness·
—
100

Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.
Sakkari M.[4]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.
Kvitova P.[2]
6-06-4
Sakkari M.[4]
Swiatek I.[1]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Sakkari M.[4]
Martincova T.
7-56-3
Kontaveit A.
Bencic B.[3]
6-46-3
Kvitova P.[2]
Teichmann J.
6-46-4
Swiatek I.[1]
Rybakina E.[7]
7-656-2
R16
Teichmann J.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-31-66-4
Martincova T.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[5]
7-657-66
Kvitova P.[2]
Potapova A.
6-16-746-3
Swiatek I.[1]
Putintseva Y.
6-46-4
Kontaveit A.
Badosa P.[9]
6-36-4
Bencic B.[3]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-26-3
Rybakina E.[7]
Linette M.
6-32-66-1
Sakkari M.[4]
Ostapenko J.
6-46-2
R32
Pavlyuchenkova A.[5]
Konjuh A.
7-636-1
Putintseva Y.
Zhang S.
5-77-676-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Zakharova A.
6-36-3
Linette M.
Dodin O.
6-27-63
Rybakina E.[7]
Kudermetova V.
6-16-3
Ostapenko J.
Blinkova A.
6-46-0
Martincova T.
Siniakova K.
5-76-47-67
Badosa P.[9]
Gracheva V.
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.
Cirstea S.
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Kerber A.[6]
6-26-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Ferro F.
6-41-66-4
Potapova A.
Garcia C.
6-27-66