Carlos Taberner vs Egor Gerasimov — Nur-Sultan Round of 16

Nur-Sultan · ATP · Round of 16
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1445Hard ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 September 2021
hard
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Taberner C.
5-7 7-6 7-5
Gerasimov E.
Taberner C.
57772
Gerasimov E.
76551

Carlos Taberner defeated Egor Gerasimov 5-7 7-6 7-5 in the Nur-Sultan round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Egor Gerasimov came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Serve advantage — Taberner C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
88
Break points won·Dominant
59
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerasimov E.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.
Duckworth J.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Kwon S.
Bublik A.[2]
3-67-56-3
Duckworth J.
Ivashka I.[8]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[2]
Taberner C.
6-36-4
Kwon S.
Djere L.[7]
7-642-66-0
Duckworth J.
Millman J.[5]
6-46-4
Ivashka I.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
4-66-46-1
R16
Bublik A.[2]
Kecmanovic M.
2-66-37-5
Taberner C.
Gerasimov E.
5-77-657-5
Kwon S.
Lajovic D.[3]
7-56-4
Millman J.[5]
Munar J.
6-46-757-5
Duckworth J.
Krajinovic F.[4]
7-626-3
Ivashka I.[8]
Skatov T.
6-26-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Karatsev A.[1]
7-666-4
Djere L.[7]
Musetti L.
6-46-736-4
R32
Ruusuvuori E.
Bonzi B.
6-20-0
Kecmanovic M.
Verdasco F.
6-46-2
Taberner C.
Berankis R.
7-56-4
Gerasimov E.
Paire B.[6]
7-56-4
Kwon S.
Donskoy E.
6-46-3
Musetti L.
Polmans M.
6-42-66-4
Djere L.[7]
Galan D.
6-43-66-4
Millman J.[5]
Popko D.
3-66-16-4
Munar J.
Vesely J.
6-37-66
Duckworth J.
Kukushkin M.
7-636-1
Ivashka I.[8]
Ymer E.
6-26-4
Skatov T.
Seppi A.
7-634-66-1