Tennys Sandgren vs Gijs Brouwer — Columbus CH Round of 16
Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 September 2021
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
3.0
Surface form4.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streakFatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Sandgren T.
662
Brouwer G.
440
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form59%1st serve in+9%68%
77%1st serve points won+9%68%
51%2nd serve points won+2%49%
67%Service points won+5%62%
36%Return points won+3%39%
67%Break points saved+9%58%
11Aces / match+7.83.2
3Double faults / match3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Torpegaard M.
2-67-646-4
Vukic A.
Bolt A.[3]
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-0
Wolf J.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-33-67-65
R16
Mejia N.
Kelly D.
6-40-66-2
Torpegaard M.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-16-4
Vukic A.
Kingsley C.
7-647-5
Purcell M.
Peniston R.
6-37-67
Kozlov S.
Kubler J.
6-27-5
Wolf J.[7]
King E.
6-36-0
Bolt A.[3]
Nam J.
7-656-4
Sandgren T.[1]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
R32
Kelly D.
Caruso S.[2]
6-23-0
Bolt A.[3]
Rubin N.
7-657-64
Sandgren T.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Kovacevic A.
3-66-37-5
Vukic A.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-47-5
Kozlov S.
Krueger M.[8]
6-06-3
Brouwer G.
King D.
7-616-0
Mejia N.
Chappell N.
5-0
Wolf J.[7]
Mukund S.
6-36-2
Peniston R.
Jung J.[5]
6-36-4
Nam J.
Chung Y.
3-66-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-737-65
Kingsley C.
Vocel M.
5-76-17-63
Kubler J.
Polansky P.
7-666-4
King E.
Aragone J.
6-46-4