Marketa Vondrousova vs Alison Van Uytvanck — Luxembourg Round of 32

Luxembourg · WTA · Round of 32
Marketa Vondrousova
CZE5
Marketa Vondrousova
#120WTA
1907ELO
1826Hard ELO
$33kYTD
$12MCAREER
27 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
BEL
Alison Van Uytvanck
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Vondrousova M.
6-2 6-3
Van Uytvanck A.
Vondrousova M.
662
Van Uytvanck A.
230

Marketa Vondrousova defeated Alison Van Uytvanck 6-2 6-3 in the Luxembourg round of 32 on hard. Marketa Vondrousova extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-23Chicago 1R16hardMarketa Vondrousova6-1 1-0 RET
2019-02-18BudapestFclayAlison Van Uytvanck1-6 7-5 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Vondrousova M.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van Uytvanck A.

Van Uytvanck A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vondrousova M.

Serve advantage — Vondrousova M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vondrousova M.Van Uytvanck A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vondrousova M.Van Uytvanck A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
77
Break points won·Dominant
99
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vondrousova M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Uytvanck A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.7
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Tauson C.
Ostapenko J.[3]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[3]
Samsonova L.[7]
6-17-64
Tauson C.
Vondrousova M.[5]
6-42-66-4
Quarter-finals
Samsonova L.[7]
Bencic B.[1]
6-16-4
Vondrousova M.[5]
Mertens E.[2]
7-56-2
Tauson C.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Cornet A.[8]
7-666-2
R16
Samsonova L.[7]
Dodin O.
7-657-63
Bencic B.[1]
Diyas Z.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[8]
Minella M.
6-36-3
Mertens E.[2]
Sasnovich A.
3-66-27-5
Ostapenko J.[3]
Hartono A.
6-24-66-1
Bouzkova M.
Minnen G.
6-36-1
Tauson C.
Alexandrova E.[4]
6-43-67-61
Vondrousova M.[5]
Fett J.
6-26-4
R32
Minnen G.
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-646-717-62
Bouzkova M.
Zhang S.[6]
6-26-736-3
Tauson C.
Sharma A.
6-26-2
Fett J.
Makarova E.
6-36-3
Sasnovich A.
Tsurenko L.
7-57-66
Samsonova L.[7]
Doi M.
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[4]
Voegele S.
6-13-66-3
Vondrousova M.[5]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-3
Diyas Z.
Schmiedlova A.
6-01-66-4
Dodin O.
Zakharova A.
6-746-46-3
Ostapenko J.[3]
Niemeier J.
6-26-2
Minella M.
Gracheva V.
6-36-4
Cornet A.[8]
Potapova A.
6-46-2
Hartono A.
Friedsam A.
7-653-67-64