Ryan Peniston vs Peter Polansky — Cary 2 CH Round of 32

Cary 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
CAN
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Peniston R.
6-3 6-2
Polansky P.
Peniston R.
662
Polansky P.
320

Ryan Peniston defeated Peter Polansky 6-3 6-2 in the Cary 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Even
20
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
60
82
Break points won·Clear edge
25
12
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
16
Tiebreaks·Even
15
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Polansky P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Kudla D.[2]
6-23-67-62
Fratangelo B.[8]
Vukic A.
6-727-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Mmoh M.[7]
7-636-3
Vukic A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Peniston R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-2
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Hijikata R.
7-56-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-1
Peniston R.
Eubanks C.
4-67-666-4
Vukic A.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-4
Kudla D.[2]
Kovacevic A.
6-726-26-3
Krueger M.[6]
Kelly D.
6-46-4
R32
Kudla D.[2]
Young D.
7-634-66-2
Kovacevic A.
Johns G.
7-636-4
Mukund S.
Staeheli L.
6-35-76-1
Purcell M.
Bolt A.[4]
6-46-1
Aragone J.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-26-3
Kelly D.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[6]
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.
Jung J.[5]
6-46-4
Vukic A.
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[3]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Sarkissian A.
6-25-76-1
Mochizuki S.
Blanch U.
7-56-0
Peniston R.
Polansky P.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.
Sandgren T.[1]
0-1
Svajda Z.
Kozlov S.
7-52-0