Chun Hsin Tseng vs Roberto Marcora — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 32

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
ITA
Roberto Marcora
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
Tseng C.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Marcora R.
Tseng C.
6262
Marcora R.
1641

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Roberto Marcora 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marcora R.

Marcora R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Tseng C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Marcora R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Marcora R.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
78
Break points won·Clear edge
15
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
58
Tiebreaks·Even
23
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marcora R.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
2.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1