Mats Moraing vs Tomas Machac — Rennes CH Round of 16

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE8
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Moraing M.
7-6 6-1
Machac T.
Moraing M.
71162
Machac T.
6910

Mats Moraing defeated Tomas Machac 7-6 6-1 in the Rennes CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mats Moraing came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Moraing M.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Machac T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
98
Break points won·Dominant
18
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Machac T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
7.9
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[3]
Moraing M.
7-637-63
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.[3]
Rinderknech A.[2]
6-797-646-1
Moraing M.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-45-76-2
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[2]
Pouille L.[6]
6-37-63
Bonzi B.[3]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Moraing M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-63
Gasquet R.[1]
Safiullin R.
7-667-5
R16
Rinderknech A.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-686-2
Pouille L.[6]
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bonzi B.[3]
Zuk K.
7-636-3
Broady L.
Barrere G.[7]
7-674-66-4
Moraing M.
Machac T.[8]
7-696-1
Safiullin R.
Murray A.[5]
6-24-66-1
Gasquet R.[1]
Chidekh C.
6-16-4
Gabashvili T.
Escobedo E.
4-66-26-3
R32
Broady L.
Bega A.
6-26-1
Rinderknech A.[2]
Kamke T.
6-33-66-3
Lamasine T.
Soeda G.
7-646-4
Hoang A.
Added D.
6-36-4
Pouille L.[6]
Janvier M.
5-76-46-3
Bonzi B.[3]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-3
Barrere G.[7]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-677-5
Machac T.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Mayot H.
4-67-56-2
Escobedo E.
Lestienne C.
7-56-1
Murray A.[5]
Maden Y.
6-36-1
Chidekh C.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Jacquet K.
7-646-3
Gabashvili T.
Simon G.[4]
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Guinard M.
6-46-3