Tristan Lamasine vs Go Soeda — Rennes CH Round of 32

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Lamasine T.
7-6 6-4
Soeda G.
Lamasine T.
7762
Soeda G.
6440

Tristan Lamasine defeated Go Soeda 7-6 6-4 in the Rennes CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tristan Lamasine came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Serve advantage — Lamasine T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (178 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
38
61
Break points won·Even
17
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
51
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamasine T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Soeda G.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[3]
Moraing M.
7-637-63
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.[3]
Rinderknech A.[2]
6-797-646-1
Moraing M.
Gasquet R.[1]
6-45-76-2
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[2]
Pouille L.[6]
6-37-63
Bonzi B.[3]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Moraing M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-63
Gasquet R.[1]
Safiullin R.
7-667-5
R16
Rinderknech A.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-686-2
Pouille L.[6]
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bonzi B.[3]
Zuk K.
7-636-3
Broady L.
Barrere G.[7]
7-674-66-4
Moraing M.
Machac T.[8]
7-696-1
Safiullin R.
Murray A.[5]
6-24-66-1
Gasquet R.[1]
Chidekh C.
6-16-4
Gabashvili T.
Escobedo E.
4-66-26-3
R32
Broady L.
Bega A.
6-26-1
Rinderknech A.[2]
Kamke T.
6-33-66-3
Lamasine T.
Soeda G.
7-646-4
Hoang A.
Added D.
6-36-4
Pouille L.[6]
Janvier M.
5-76-46-3
Bonzi B.[3]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-3
Barrere G.[7]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-677-5
Machac T.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Mayot H.
4-67-56-2
Escobedo E.
Lestienne C.
7-56-1
Murray A.[5]
Maden Y.
6-36-1
Chidekh C.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Jacquet K.
7-646-3
Gabashvili T.
Simon G.[4]
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Guinard M.
6-46-3