Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Daniel Michalski — Szczecin CH Round of 32

Szczecin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
clay
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1386Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Kwiatkowski T.
6-3 4-6 6-1
Michalski D.
Kwiatkowski T.
6462
Michalski D.
3611

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Daniel Michalski 6-3 4-6 6-1 in the Szczecin CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Thai Son Kwiatkowski came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Michalski D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Michalski D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 182). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Michalski D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
5
26
Break points saved·Dominant
65
24
Break points won·Clear edge
6
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
1
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 56 days (−1.0)
Michalski D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kwiatkowski T.Michalski D.
Freshness·
—
73

Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kolar Z.
Majchrzak K.
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Kolar Z.
Kuhn N.
7-52-2
Majchrzak K.
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.
Cias P.
6-27-5
Majchrzak K.
Rune H.
7-656-1
Kolar Z.
De Jong J.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.
Trungelliti M.
6-17-5
R16
Majchrzak K.
Carballes Baena R.[7]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-34-67-62
Cias P.
Travaglia S.[8]
7-633-66-2
Kolar Z.
Clarke J.
6-16-1
Rune H.
Andujar P.[2]
6-16-1
Kuhn N.
Rybakov A.
6-26-2
De Jong J.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-61
Trungelliti M.
Monteiro T.[6]
6-46-3
R32
Andujar P.[2]
Taberner C.
7-626-4
Rune H.
Daniel T.
6-37-5
Carballes Baena R.[7]
Sachko V.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.[4]
Novak D.
6-36-3
Cias P.
Kopriva V.
6-24-66-4
Travaglia S.[8]
Nagal S.
3-66-16-4
Kolar Z.
Vesely J.[5]
7-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
De Jong J.
Lehecka J.
7-653-67-63
Monteiro T.[6]
Diez S.
6-06-3
Kuhn N.
Ramos A.[1]
1-66-46-4
Rybakov A.
Petrovic D.
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.
Gaston H.
3-66-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Pellegrino A.
6-37-67
Trungelliti M.
Martineau M.
4-66-46-3
Clarke J.
Vatutin A.
6-04-0