Denis Kudla vs Michael Mmoh — Cary 2 CH Quarter-final

Cary 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA2
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA7
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Kudla D.
7-6 6-3
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.
7762
Mmoh M.
6330

Denis Kudla defeated Michael Mmoh 7-6 6-3 in the Cary 2 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonR64hardDenis Kudla1-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
66
Break points saved·Even
90
91
Break points won·Clear edge
19
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
82
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mmoh M.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.4
H2H
4.6
6.5
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
94

Mmoh M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Kudla D.[2]
6-23-67-62
Fratangelo B.[8]
Vukic A.
6-727-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Mmoh M.[7]
7-636-3
Vukic A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Peniston R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-2
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Hijikata R.
7-56-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-1
Peniston R.
Eubanks C.
4-67-666-4
Vukic A.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-4
Kudla D.[2]
Kovacevic A.
6-726-26-3
Krueger M.[6]
Kelly D.
6-46-4
R32
Kudla D.[2]
Young D.
7-634-66-2
Kovacevic A.
Johns G.
7-636-4
Mukund S.
Staeheli L.
6-35-76-1
Purcell M.
Bolt A.[4]
6-46-1
Aragone J.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-26-3
Kelly D.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[6]
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.
Jung J.[5]
6-46-4
Vukic A.
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[3]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Sarkissian A.
6-25-76-1
Mochizuki S.
Blanch U.
7-56-0
Peniston R.
Polansky P.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.
Sandgren T.[1]
0-1
Svajda Z.
Kozlov S.
7-52-0