Mitchell Krueger vs Max Purcell — Cary 2 CH Quarter-final

Cary 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mitchell Krueger
USA6
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Krueger M.
6-3 6-2
Purcell M.
Krueger M.
662
Purcell M.
320

Mitchell Krueger defeated Max Purcell 6-3 6-2 in the Cary 2 CH quarter-final on hard. Mitchell Krueger extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05DallasR32hardMax Purcell6-2 4-6 7-6(3)
2021-08-02WashingtonQ2hardMitchell Krueger3-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
7.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
92
Break points won·Even
14
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Purcell M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.3
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Purcell M.
Freshness·
87
—

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Kudla D.[2]
6-23-67-62
Fratangelo B.[8]
Vukic A.
6-727-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Mmoh M.[7]
7-636-3
Vukic A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Peniston R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-2
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Hijikata R.
7-56-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-1
Peniston R.
Eubanks C.
4-67-666-4
Vukic A.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-4
Kudla D.[2]
Kovacevic A.
6-726-26-3
Krueger M.[6]
Kelly D.
6-46-4
R32
Kudla D.[2]
Young D.
7-634-66-2
Kovacevic A.
Johns G.
7-636-4
Mukund S.
Staeheli L.
6-35-76-1
Purcell M.
Bolt A.[4]
6-46-1
Aragone J.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-26-3
Kelly D.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[6]
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.
Jung J.[5]
6-46-4
Vukic A.
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[3]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Sarkissian A.
6-25-76-1
Mochizuki S.
Blanch U.
7-56-0
Peniston R.
Polansky P.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.
Sandgren T.[1]
0-1
Svajda Z.
Kozlov S.
7-52-0