Tung Lin Wu vs Borna Gojo — Istanbul 2 CH Semi-final

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Wu T.
6-4 3-6 6-4
Gojo B.
Wu T.
6362
Gojo B.
4641

Tung Lin Wu defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the Istanbul 2 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
10.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
95
Break points won·Even
6
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gojo B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
1.8Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
8.2+286 Hard Elo edge
1.9Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
8.1Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Gojo B.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
100

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1