Alexis Gautier vs Johan Nikles — Quito CH Round of 32

Quito CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Alexis Gautier
#800ATP
29 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Gautier A.
6-0 6-4
Nikles J.
Gautier A.
662
Nikles J.
040

Alexis Gautier defeated Johan Nikles 6-0 6-4 in the Quito CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gautier A.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gautier A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gautier A.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
72%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gautier A.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
7
Break points saved·Dominant
48
22
Break points won·Dominant
5
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
5
29
Tiebreaks·
—
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gautier A.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 63 days (−1.2)
Nikles J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.[6]
Lama G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Mena F.[6]
Gautier A.
6-24-66-2
Lama G.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-6116-4
Quarter-finals
Gautier A.
Perchicot M.
6-46-3
Mena F.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-46-0
Martin Tiffon P.
Ficovich J.[5]
3-66-36-4
Lama G.
Tirante T.[7]
7-657-64
R16
Gautier A.
Gomez E.[2]
7-57-62
Perchicot M.
Quiroz R.[8]
2-66-26-3
Olivieri G.
Olivo R.[4]
6-26-2
Tirante T.[7]
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-56-2
Ficovich J.[5]
Esteve Lobato E.
2-67-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Gonzalez A.
4-67-646-3
Mena F.[6]
Rodriguez C.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Vilella Martinez M.[3]
3-67-646-3
R32
Gautier A.
Nikles J.
6-06-4
Perchicot M.
March C.
6-46-0
Olivo R.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-46-4
Olivieri G.
Roca Batalla O.
3-66-37-5
Mena F.[6]
Gomez Gb42 A.
7-667-5
Tirante T.[7]
Kypson P.
6-776-16-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Guillen Meza A.
7-54-66-2
Vilella Martinez M.[3]
Langmo C.
6-36-756-2
Esteve Lobato E.
Oliveira G.
6-26-3
Gonzalez A.
Castelnuovo L.
6-27-64
Martin Tiffon P.
Martin A.[1]
7-667-5
Quiroz R.[8]
Hidalgo D.
6-47-5
Ficovich J.[5]
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Rodriguez C.
Zukas M.
6-747-57-64