Borna Gojo vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 32

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1497Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Gojo B.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Galan D.
Gojo B.
6362
Galan D.
4621

Borna Gojo defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
48
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Slight edge
10
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
73
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Galan D.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.1+165 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1497
7.0Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1531
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Galan D.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1